The icon indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR.

During the last few weeks, I’ve been watching a lot of cute animal videos. My particular subgenre of choice has been videos of animals eating. It’s hard to be overwhelmed by the ugliness of the world while watching a squeaking porcupine chowing down on pumpkins. At the same time, it’s hard to turn off the part of my brain that watches the eating habits of wildlife with scientific curiosity. Animals, after all, consume food using an impressive range of bio-mechanisms: Dogs and cats, for example, use physics, taking advantage of the surface tension of water by drawing up columns of liquid with their tongues. The thin proboscis of a butterfly, on the other hand, exploits capillary action to pull in nectar without the need for muscles. And bird bills specifically match the particular food items available to each bird species. Among all these incredible eating tools, however, nothing can match the power of the thumb.

JSTOR Daily Membership AdJSTOR Daily Membership Ad

Fully opposable thumbs were a watershed development in human evolutionary history. Thumbs allow us to manipulate tools with surgical precision, granting access to an almost unrestricted range of food resources. But thumbs aren’t unique to humans. Other animals have evolved similar structures, sometimes in fascinating ways.

Take the Giant Panda, for example. Watch a panda eat, and you’ll notice the thumb-like appendage that helps it hold onto bamboo stalks. The panda’s thumb isn’t actually a thumb; it’s an elongated wrist bone that opposes the five true fingers of the panda’s hand, allowing it to grip and manipulate the delicate bamboo stalks that form the majority of its diet. For an enormous organism like a panda to survive on an energy-poor resource like bamboo, most of which is composed of indigestible fiber, maximizing eating efficiency is key. Without gripping abilities, pandas would require more effort to consume less bamboo, compromising their ability to meet their energy needs. The misleadingly named Red Panda (it’s more closely related to weasels, raccoons, skunks, and badgers than to bears) has this same strange elongated wrist bone. In fact, this bizarre trait, along with a similar bamboo-based diet, helped contribute to the assumption that the two species were related. But the trait evolved separately in the two pandas, and for entirely different reasons.

At Cerro de los Batallones, a paleontological site in Madrid, researchers unearthed the fossil remains of a Red Panda relative called Simocyon batalleri that had the same adaptation. The catch: Simocyon batalleri was carnivorous, not a bamboo-eater. The discovery suggests that the false thumbs of Red Pandas evolved to help them grip narrow branches while climbing trees, unrelated to eating bamboo. Several other arboreal species, including possums and koalas, have developed opposable or semi-opposable thumbs, although all of them have a modified digit more similar to the human thumb than the peculiar wrist bones of the pandas.

The false thumbs of the pandas are a striking example of convergent evolution: the same trait evolving separately in unrelated groups of animals in response to similar needs. In one famous example, bats and marine mammals, faced with the challenge of navigating in the dark, independently developed the ability to echolocate. The awkward but functional pseudo-thumbs of the pandas evolved to solve different problems—one for climbing, the other for eating—but in both cases converged on an analog to the opposable thumb through modification of the same physical structure.


JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

Current Anthropology, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1965), pp. 412-414
The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research
Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 18, No. 1 (1937), pp. 13-19
American Society of Mammalogists
Ursus, Vol. 18, No. 1 (2007), pp. 38-45
International Association for Bear Research and Management
Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 69, No. 3 (1988), pp. 552-564
American Society of Mammalogists
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 2 (Jan. 10, 2006), pp. 379-382
National Academy of Sciences