Skip to content
where news meets its scholarly match
  • Newsletters
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art & Art History
    • Film & Media
    • Language & Literature
    • Performing Arts
  • Business & Economics
    • Business
    • Economics
  • Politics & History
    • Politics & Government
    • U.S. History
    • World History
    • Social History
    • Quirky History
  • Science & Technology
    • Health
    • Natural Science
    • Plants & Animals
    • Sustainability & The Environment
    • Technology
  • Education & Society
    • Education
    • Lifestyle
    • Religion
    • Social Sciences
  • About JSTOR Daily
  • Newsletters
  • Contact The Editors
  • Support JSTOR Daily
Education & Society

When Science and Religion Were Connected

During the Second Great Awakening of 1830, science and religion were seen as “two aspects of the same universal truth.”

methodist religious revival
Engraving of a Methodist camp meeting, 1819.
via Library of Congress
By: Livia Gershon
September 4, 2018 August 31, 2018
3 minutes
Share Tweet Email Print

The contrast between the cold logic of science and the emotionality of religion is a seemingly unshakable binary today. But back in the early nineteenth century, people saw things very differently. Historian Jeffrey A. Mullins examines the religious revivals of the Second Great Awakening in the 1830s.

At that time, Mullins writes, Americans did not see science and religion as opposites. Instead, they were “two aspects of the same universal truth.” And that truth was not based in pure logic. Emotions were a key to human behavior, and controlling and channeling emotions was a job for scientifically- and morally-grounded experts.

This perspective led to a wealth of reformist interventions, from Sunday schools to penitentiaries to graham crackers. Preachers who led religious revivals around the country in the 1830s saw the need for a highly engineered emotional experience.

Religious leaders like prominent Presbyterian minister Charles Grandison Finney travelled from state to state, holding multi-day revivals featuring nighttime preaching, sermons that called on the audience to scrutinize their own sins, and a constant drumbeat of prayer and religious discussion. The events were carefully planned for maximum emotional impact, and they were highly successful, reliably resulting in multiple conversions.

Days and nights of energetic preaching and prayer wore people’s defenses down and excited their “animal passions.”

Many fellow Protestants complained about the formulaic psychological methods, or saw the revivalists as focusing too much on human agency rather than leaving conversions in God’s hands. Universalist Reverend Hosea Faxon Ballou, for example, criticized one revival for its “management and contrivance” by “erring mortals.”

Ballou argued that feelings of grace induced by a premeditated scheme were illegitimate. Days and nights of energetic preaching and prayer simply wore people’s defenses down and excited their “animal passions.”

Want more stories like this one?

    Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.

    Privacy Policy   Contact Us

    You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.

    But, to Finney and his colleagues, there was nothing wrong with a mechanistic system that prepared souls for conversion. Finney drew on agricultural metaphors to make the case for a scientific approach to spiritual matters. Just like a farmer using agricultural knowledge to cultivate grain, preachers could harness the “laws of nature” to predictably induce a religious awakening among a group.

    Imagine, he wrote, preaching to farmers

    that God is sovereign, and will give them a crop only when it pleases him, and that for them to plow and plant and labor as if they expected to raise a crop is very wrong… and that there is no connection between the means and the result on which they can depend…. Why, they would starve the world to death.

    Revivalists also challenged more conventional Christian reformers’ focus on gradual self-improvement as the road toward salvation and moral behavior. “Shedding the need for prolonged preparation, revivals reinvigorated the idea that all souls were equal before God, and thus had equal capacity to accept his grace,” Mullins writes. And, the preachers argued, having opened to this grace during a revival, newly reborn Christians would gain the “knowledge and perspective as well as the strength to will against sinful choices.”

    Emotions, elicited through a scientifically planned process, were the catalyst for true religious belief.

    Share Tweet Email Print
    Have a correction or comment about this article?
    Please contact us.
    Christianitynineteenth centuryInternational Social Science Review
    JSTOR logo

    Resources

    JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

    "FITTED TO RECEIVE THE WORD OF GOD": EMOTIONS AND SCIENTIFIC NATURALISM IN THE RELIGIOUS REVIVALS OF THE 1830s
    By: JEFFREY A. MULLINS
    International Social Science Review, Vol. 81, No. 1/2 (2006), pp. 3-15
    Pi Gamma Mu, International Honor Society in Social Sciences

    Join Our Newsletter

      Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.

      Privacy Policy   Contact Us

      You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.

      Read this next

      anti-abolitionist cartoon
      Education & Society

      How Antebellum Christians Justified Slavery

      After Emancipation, some Southern Protestants refused to revise their proslavery views. In their minds, slavery had been divinely sanctioned.

      Trending Posts

      1. The Punk Rock Linguistics of Cottagecore
      2. Charles Darwin’s Descent of Man, 150 Years Later
      3. The Claude Glass Revolutionized the Way People Saw Landscapes
      4. Herbs & Verbs: How to Do Witchcraft for Real
      5. The Devastation of Black Wall Street

      More Stories

      Photograph: Pro-Trump protesters gather in front of the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC

Source: Getty
      Social Sciences

      Was the Capitol Attack Part of a New Wave of Terrorism?

      A political scientist suggests that the right-wing violence of recent years might be a new current in a longer history.
      Schoolchildren in Soweto, South Africa
      Education

      Kids’ Games in South Africa

      Formal education in language and music is important for children, but as one scholar found, so is their own play involving gesture, slang, and pop songs.
      The 135th St Branch of the New York Public Library
      Language & Literature

      JSTOR Companion to the Schomburg Center’s Black Liberation Reading List

      JSTOR has created an open library to support readers seeking to engage with BIPOC+Q-authored reading lists like the one developed by the New York Public Library.
      A man displays a Ku Klux Klan cross tattooed onto his arm
      Social Sciences

      How White Supremacy Is Like a Drug

      Four researchers found that identifying with a hate group can produce pleasurable sensations in the brain.

      Recent Posts

      1. Hair Embroidery as Women’s Buddhist Practice
      2. Slavery in a Free State: The Case of California
      3. The Legacy of Racial Hatred in the January 6 Insurrection
      4. The Punk Rock Linguistics of Cottagecore
      5. Madame Stephanie St. Clair: Numbers Queen of Harlem

      Support JSTOR Daily

      Help us keep publishing stories that provide scholarly context to the news.
      Become a member

      JSTOR Daily provides context for current events using scholarship found in JSTOR, a digital library of academic journals, books, and other material. We publish articles grounded in peer-reviewed research and provide free access to that research for all of our readers.

      • Contact The Editors
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Masthead
      • Newsletters
      • About Us
      • RSS
      • Support JSTOR Daily
      • JSTOR.org
      • Terms and Conditions of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookie Policy
      • Accessibility
      logo

      JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.

      © ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR®, the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA.

      Sign up for our weekly newsletter

        Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.

        Privacy Policy   Contact Us

        You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.