The icon indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR.

On February 8, 2024, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Trump v. Anderson: whether a state (Colorado) can remove a presidential candidate from a primary ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. The former President is appealing the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court that found “Mr. Trump’s actions before and on Jan. 6, 2021, constituted engaging in insurrection, and that courts had the authority to enforce Section 3 against a person whom Congress had not specifically designated.”

JSTOR Daily Membership AdJSTOR Daily Membership Ad

It’s not the first time the Fourteenth Amendment has been involved in a presidential election: in 2000, the majority decision in Bush v. Gore held that the equal protection clause in Section 1 required the recount of the “hanging chad” be stopped, effectively awarding George W. Bush the presidency.

The scope of US Supreme Court decisions resting on portions of the Fourteenth Amendment is quite broad and encompasses foundational issues of American civil rights and liberties, including citizenship, marriage, reproductive choice, LGBTQ+ rights, voting rights, and the rights of those accused of crimes. As one of the Reconstruction Amendments meant to modify (or in some cases, create) a framework for the post-Civil War federal government, the Fourteenth came to include much of what was needed in a “new” America.

The scholarship of the Constitution, and of the individual amendments, is well-represented in JSTOR; this annotation of the Fourteenth Amendment is only a small sample of what can be found. As always with Annotations, all linked articles are free to read and access.

Free JSTOR Citation

The red J indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR.

________________________

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

[Text taken from: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/]


Support JSTOR Daily! Join our membership program on Patreon today.

Resources

JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

Social Science, Vol. 50, No. 1 (Winter 1975), pp. 3–9
Pi Gamma Mu, International Honor Society in Social Sciences
The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108, No. 8, Symposium: Moments of Change: Transformation in American Constitutionalism (June 1999), pp. 2003–2009
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
The American Historical Review, Vol. 92, No. 1 (February 1987), pp. 45–68
Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Historical Association
Journal of the Civil War Era, Vol. 10, No. 1, Cracks in the Foundation: The Fourteenth Amendment and Its Limits: A Special Issue (March 2020), pp. 29–53
University of North Carolina Press
The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 101, No. 6 (April 1992), pp. 1193–1284
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 8, Symposium Issue: the Gideon Effect: Rights, Justice, and Lawyers Fifty Years After Gideon V. Wainwright (June 2013), pp. 2150–2174
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
Columbia Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 1 (January 2023), pp. 1–100
Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.
Daedalus, Vol. 143, No. 3, The Invention of Courts (Summer 2014), pp. 51–61
The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences
The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 97, No. 6 (May 1988), pp. 1153–1172
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
The Journal of American History, Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 2001), pp. 436–443
Oxford University Press on behalf of Organization of American Historians
Family Advocate, Vol. 38, No. 4, Same-Sex Marriage Is Settled: But important questions remain (Spring 2016), pp. 6–10
American Bar Association
Duke Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3 (December 2003), pp. 875–965
Duke University School of Law
Equality under the Constitution: Reclaiming the Fourteenth Amendment, (1983), pp. 57–72
Cornell University Press
Journal of the Civil War Era, Vol. 10, No. 1, Cracks in the Foundation: The Fourteenth Amendment and Its Limits: A Special Issue (March 2020), pp. 81–104
University of North Carolina Press
Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 67, No. 3, Conservative and Progressive Legal Orders (Summer, 2004), pp. 175–211
Duke University School of Law
The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 121, No. 7 (May 2012), pp. 1584–1670
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
Racism & Felony Disenfranchisement: An Intertwined History
Brennan Center for Justice
The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 22, No. 4 (November 1956), pp. 477–497
Southern Historical Association
Negro History Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 1 (OCTOBER 1948), pp. 10–11, 15–18
Association for the Study of African American Life and History
Virginia Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 6 (October 2013), pp. 1291–1326
Virginia Law Review
The Journal of American History, Vol. 74, No. 3, The Constitution and American Life: A Special Issue (December 1987), pp. 863–883
Oxford University Press on behalf of Organization of American Historians
ABA Journal, Vol. 103, No. 5 (May 2017), pp. 36–47
American Bar Association
The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 49, No. 2 (April 2007), pp. 180–196
Oxford University Press