The icon indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR.

The Holiday season is here – and with it the seemingly-endless round of Grinchmas Parties, Winter Wonderlands, Holiday Brunches and all the rest. If you’re single, you might be looking for a holiday romance, or maybe even something more. Either way, first impressions count. You know that moment when your brain goes full FBI mode the minute you so much as glimpse someone’s face. Your eyes meet across the eggnog and instantly you’re deciding: are they dependable and kind-hearted, the swoon-worthy novel hero you’ve been waiting for, or the kind who’ll have you second-guessing your life choices by January? It’s like your intuition has its own internal radar, instantly scanning and sorting people into “safe,” “hmm,” or “proceed with caution.” But as the year winds down and the air hums with Maria Carey and the promise of new beginnings, it’s worth asking: can we really tell anything from that first glance? Can we, in fact, judge a book by its cover?

“Perspectives“Perspectives

Well, science just pulled up (to the Xmas party) with receipts, and the answer is a cautious “yes, a little bit.” Over the years, quite a few studies have asked participants to rate participants’ faces for apparent trustworthiness, aggressiveness, honesty, and even criminality and sexual unfaithfulness, and then looked to see how well these judgements predict people’s actual scores on these traits. A recent meta-analysis pooled 25 solid studies of this type, with nearly 2,000 faces, and over 3,500 participants, to see if those split-second judgments actually reveal anything real. Basically, it’s the scientific version of “Can you spot the red flag just by looking at them?”. When, during the fairy-light glow of a holiday party, someone’s face gives off that “He’ll ghost you before breakfast” energy, are you spotting a real warning sign, or just letting your Netflix-level imagination run wild?

More to Explore

Winter: Skating Scene (From Set of Four Seasons) from Balloch Castle, Scotland

Fighting for the Right to Party at Christmas

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the Reformed Kirk of Scotland tried to shut down holiday celebrations. The Scottish people didn’t give up easily.

Turns out that little “something feels off” gut instinct might not be just holiday stress talking. For starters, participants’ judgments of aggressiveness based on faces alone did correlate with their actual aggressiveness, albeit modestly. How modestly? Well, people obviously differ in how aggressive they are. From looking at their faces alone it’s possible to predict about 28% of the aggressiveness differences between people. For agreeableness (being nice) and criminal behaviour, participants’ face-based impressions were much less accurate: around 3%. Better than chance, but definitely useless for all practical purposes. However, for sexual unfaithfulness – a particularly crucial characteristic if you’re looking for Mr. Right – participants were best of all, at 38%. Not perfect, and definitely no crystal ball, but possibly enough to make that little twinge under the twinkling lights worth paying attention to.

So, what’s the takeaway for us holiday-romance seekers? No, it’s not that love isn’t real or that you should rush out and adopt nine cats (though no judgment!). Neither should you immediately take any face-based cheater vibes at face value; even this effect is small and unreliable. But a little caution never hurt anyone, and just a sprinkle could end up saving you from awkward DMs, ghosting, or drama bigger than a Love Island finale. So, the next time your brain goes full FBI mode at that first glance, don’t brush it off. Your gut might just be spotting the red flags before your heart even has a chance to get involved.

Resources

JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

Child Development, Vol. 90, No. 2, SPECIAL SECTION: Children's Subjective Well-Being (MARCH/APRIL 2019), pp. 562-575
Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development
Proceedings: Biological Sciences, Vol. 275, No. 1651 (Nov. 22, 2008), pp. 2651-2656
Royal Society
Psychological Science, Vol. 27, No. 2 (FEBRUARY 2016), pp. 282-288
Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the Association for Psychological Science
Psychological Science, Vol. 26, No. 8 (AUGUST 2015), pp. 1325-1331
Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the Association for Psychological Science