Skip to content
from JSTOR, nonprofit library for the intellectually curious
  • Newsletters
  • Become a member
  • Membership
  • About JSTOR Daily
  • Support JSTOR Daily
  • Teaching with Reveal Digital’s American Prison Newspapers Collection
  • Newsletters
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art & Art History
    • Film & Media
    • Language & Literature
    • Performing Arts
  • Business & Economics
    • Business
    • Economics
  • Politics & History
    • Politics & Government
    • U.S. History
    • World History
    • Social History
    • Quirky History
  • Science & Technology
    • Health
    • Natural Science
    • Plants & Animals
    • Sustainability & The Environment
    • Technology
  • Education & Society
    • Education
    • Lifestyle
    • Religion
    • Social Sciences
  • Reading Lists
  • Syllabi
  • Columns
  • Shared Collections on JSTOR
  • Contact The Editors
Arts & Culture

A Teen Celebrity in 1804

When thirteen-year-old actor William Henry West Betty arrived in London from Ireland, crowds mobbed theaters and camped outside his home.

William Henry West Betty by John Opie, 1804
William Henry West Betty by John Opie, 1804
via Wikimedia Commons
Share
Copy link Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Reddit WhatsApp Email
By: Livia Gershon
September 8, 2023 September 15, 2023
3 minutes
The icon indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR.

Crowds mobbing theaters. Audience members screaming. A merchandising machine set up around a thirteen-year-old kid. These are the stuff of twentieth and twenty-first century pop culture. But, as English professor Jeffrey Kahan explains, they’re also the story of a child actor at the turn of the nineteenth century.

JSTOR Daily Membership AdJSTOR Daily Membership Ad

In 1804, Kahan writes, the barely teenage actor William Henry West Betty arrived in England from Ireland. Crowds mobbed theaters to get tickets, and at least one woman was trampled to death in Liverpool. At Betty’s London premiere, the theater placed guards outside, but to no avail. The masses swarmed in, overrunning private boxes, and breaking windows and doors. A newspaper reported that the “screams of females were very distressing, and several fainted away.”

Betty’s second appearance in the city was similarly riotous, and two men pulled out pistols and threatened each other over a seat. Attention to these early scenes only ginned up public interest, and even a month into the boy’s time in London a newspaper reported that “crowds still continue to press the theatre on every night of his performance.” Even older men in Betty’s audiences reported being inexplicably overcome with uncontrollable weeping. Fans followed the boy everywhere, even camping outside the house where he was staying. One London restaurant changed its name to Betty’s Cook-shop.

Some critics treated England’s wholehearted embrace of the child star as a national embarrassment.

Kahan argues that Bettymania, as it was quickly dubbed in the press, was the product of careful planning. Betty’s people paid critics for good reviews, leaked his letters to the press, and authorized production of medallions, snuff boxes, coffee cups, and other merchandise. Theaters probably also used tricks to inflate the reception Betty received, like strategically placing ringers in the audience to cheer for him.

These strategies worked remarkably well on all sectors of the public. Artists around London painted, sculpted, and wrote poetry about Betty. The royal family feted him at the Tower of London. Lord Byron reported that he braved theaters to see Betty on several occasions “at the hazard of my life.” And William Wordsworth expressed hope that the boy could “rescue the English theatre from the infamy that has fallen upon it.”

Weekly Newsletter


    Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.


    Privacy Policy   Contact Us
    You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.

    Not everyone was impressed. Kahan writes that some critics treated England’s wholehearted embrace of the child star as a national embarrassment. But the virulent backlash they received from Betty’s defenders only served to further bolster his image. At a time when the esteemed actor John Philip Kemble was paid £12 a night, Betty’s fee climbed to £100, and he once received £1,200 for a single performance.

    Like many child stars since, Betty faded from public view long before reaching adulthood. While he returned to the stage in 1812 and continued performing for another decade, he never commanded audiences’ attention in the same way again. Some critics argued that his early fame had spoiled his genius, while others believed the theater world had simply been wrong about his promise. As one writer described him much later, he was “only a surprising boy…who became but an ordinary man.”

    You might like:

    Sarah Bernhardt, 1899

    To Be or Not to Be Hamlet

    The Editors
    April 23, 2020
    The drama of playing the famous prince. In pictures.

    Support JSTOR Daily! Join our new membership program on Patreon today.

    Have a correction or comment about this article?
    Please contact us.
    celebrityTheater HistoryHistorical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung. Supplement
    JSTOR logo

    Resources

    JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

    Bettymania and the Death of Celebrity Culture
    By: Jeffrey Kahan
    Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung. Supplement, No. 32, Supplement: Celebrity’s Histories: Case Studies & Critical Perspectives (2019), pp. 139–164
    GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

    Join Our Newsletter


      Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.


      Privacy Policy   Contact Us
      You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.

      Read this next

      A film title lantern slide for Broncho Billy
      Arts & Culture

      Whatever Happened To The Male Movie Fan?

      In the early days of the film industry, the fanzone was full of men and boys. Then the studios chased them all away.

      Trending Posts

      1. Racist Humor: Exploratory Readings
      2. Could You Stand on the Surface of Jupiter? Exploring the Enigmatic Outer Planets
      3. Kahlil Gibran: Godfather of the “New Age”
      4. Why Does the Bible Forbid Tattoos?
      5. The San Diego Lowrider Archival Project

      More Stories

      Kahlil Gibran
      Language & Literature

      Kahlil Gibran: Godfather of the “New Age”

      Published in 1923, The Prophet became a perpetual best-seller, birthed a genre, and marked the poet as retrograde, sentimental, and florid.
      Loie Fuller
      Performing Arts

      The Serpentine Career of Loïe Fuller

      Rising from the ranks of touring comedies and Wild West shows, the American dancer dreamed of a future of light, movement, and metamorphosis.
      Announcer
      Performing Arts

      How did 1960s Jacksonville Become a Musical Hotspot?

      Short answer: crime.
      Mathilde “Missy” de Morny

      The Cross-Dressing Superstar of the Belle Époque

      Mathilde de Morny's commitment to a masculine aesthetic and a non-traditional lifestyle in nineteenth-century France challenged the boundaries of gender identity.

      Recent Posts

      1. The Eight Best Hidden Impact Craters on Earth
      2. Athanasius Kircher’s “Musical Ark”
      3. The Invention of the Gifted Child
      4. Kahlil Gibran: Godfather of the “New Age”
      5. The Serpentine Career of Loïe Fuller

      Support JSTOR Daily

      Help us keep publishing stories that provide scholarly context to the news.
      Become a member

      About Us

      JSTOR Daily provides context for current events using scholarship found in JSTOR, a digital library of academic journals, books, and other material. We publish articles grounded in peer-reviewed research and provide free access to that research for all of our readers.

      • Contact The Editors
      • Masthead
      • Newsletters
      • About JSTOR Daily
      • Submission Guidelines
      • RSS
      • About the American Prison Newspapers Collection
      • Submissions: American Prison Newspapers Collection
      • Support JSTOR Daily on Patreon
      • Unsubscribe
      • JSTOR.org
      • Terms and Conditions of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookie Policy
      • Cookie Settings
      • Accessibility
      logo

      JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.

      © ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR®, the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA.

      Sign up for our weekly newsletter


        Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.


        Privacy Policy   Contact Us
        You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message.