In the depths of a book-lined study, shadows eerily morph together like restless thoughts seeking form. Here sits Turkish British author Elif Shafak, confronting a vision that will shatter her understanding of both motherhood and creativity: the milk flowing from her breast has transformed into something sinister—thick and dark as a calligrapher’s ink. This visceral metamorphosis, which haunts the pages of her memoir Black Milk: On Writing, Motherhood, and the Harem Within (2007; English translation 2011), transmutes nature’s most fundamental symbol of maternal sustenance into a potent metaphor for creative anxiety born of postpartum despair.

Shafak’s words slice through centuries of rosy myths about motherhood, exposing the raw terror that biological creation might devour its artistic sister.

“If I started to write about the experience,” she confesses, “I could turn my blackened milk into ink, and as writing had always had a magical healing effect on my soul, I could perhaps inch my way out of this depression,” she writes. This revelation becomes a catalyst, exposing one of modern literature’s most pressing paradoxes: while male writers are first “writers” and then male, for the female artist, it’s exactly the reverse, revealing the tension that lies beneath the ethos of creativity as suppressed by gender.

Before Shafak, like many other female artists, sits another motif of creative anxiety: a notebook, its pristine pages gleaming under lamplight with both seductive promise and silent condemnation. Yet this particular notebook is empty. Its blank pages are a combat zone where artistic ambition wages war against maternal obligation, each sheet a territory contested between competing identities. These twin symbols—the corrupted milk and the virgin page—materialize into what scholar Susan Matthews explores as a false binary between maternal and creative fulfillment. As Matthews illuminates, this perceived opposition has historically pathologized women’s artistic struggles, embedding them within gendered discourse, and oppressing cultural expectations in ways that male artists’ creative blocks were never forced to endure. The empty notebook becomes a mirror reflecting the abyss between societal expectations and personal artistic ambition.

In the gathering of such thoughts, Shafak conjures the spirits of her literary forebears. Sylvia Plath bent over her desk in pre-dawn darkness, Zelda Fitzgerald’s feverish scribbling between asylum walls, J.K. Rowling writing in Edinburgh cafés with a sleeping infant beside her, and Toni Morrison crafting worlds while her children dream. These spectral mentors offer both comfort and warning, their presence giving new urgency to Shafak’s metaphors. The empty notebook becomes not just a symbol of potential but a lifeline to sanity, while the black milk represents not just personal fear but post-memory, an illustration of generations of women who dared to be both mothers and creators.

Through the lens of this generational struggle Marcelle Soviero’s insight that “there still seems to be a need to dismiss motherhood as a subject worthy of real literature” resonates through Shafak’s narrative. We witness how the empty notebook becomes a paradoxical space, simultaneously representing creative death and rebirth. The blank page becomes a liminal territory where the very essence of artistic identity undergoes alchemical transformation through the crucible of motherhood.

“I consider myself a writer writing about the human condition, a writer who also happens to be a mother,” Soviero writes, observing how the physical reality of motherhood transforms the act of approaching the metaphorical existence of the notebook as a space of creativity. The embodied experience of creative interruption becomes a site of contested ownership. The breast that produces black milk is the same breast that feeds the child, creating what can be termed a physical palimpsest of competing demands.

Metaphorical black milk flows like a dark river through Shafak’s memoir, carrying multiple currents of meaning. As Catharine Savage Brosman argues, such visceral metaphors of identification represent more than mere documentation. Narration of the self is “viewed as ‘transindividual,’” leading one to look at the task of retelling the self as an apparition of identities. The black milk emerges as a generative wound, a symbol that both expresses and transforms trauma. In Shafak’s hands, this corrupted maternal fluid becomes a powerful metaphor for the fear that motherhood might poison the wellspring of creativity—yet paradoxically, it also suggests the possibility that this very fear might birth new forms of artistic expression.

Within the ornate chambers of Shafak’s psyche, a remarkable drama unfolds. Her internal harem houses competing feminine archetypes that dance and battle for dominance like shadows cast on ancient walls. She introduces Miss Ambitious Chekhovian, who paces the corridors, her intellectual heels clicking against marble floors as she warns that domestic life will suffocate artistic potential. Dame Dervish whirls in mystical circles, her robes sweeping through incense-scented air as she seeks spiritual significance in the act of motherhood. And in the warm heart of this invented palace, Mama Rice Pudding stirs fragrant pots of comfort, whispering sweet promises of conventional contentment and embodying the deeply rooted inner self that Shafak never knew she possessed—the idealized vision of motherhood complete with white wedding dress, sparkly ring, and the contented running of domestic errands. Yet in pregnancy, Mama Rice Pudding transforms into something more complex—a creative block that threatens to silence Shafak’s literary voice by forbidding books and demanding the sacrifice of artistic pursuits at the altar of maternal duty.

This harem within echoes the work of scholars such as Toril Moi, who reveals that declaring oneself a woman writer responds to cultural provocations that reinforce stigmas of the female figure primarily as woman, not writer. Jessamyn Jackson incisively brings this sociocultural struggle into sharp contemporary focus in “Why Novels Make Bad Mothers,” disclosing the struggles at the heart of “women of literary ambitions.” Jackson identifies the compartmentalization of creative and maternal labor as a persistent modern phenomenon that exists due to the imposed masculine authority over authorship; in contrast, the concept of mothering has historically been seen as the antithesis of authorship. Shafak’s inner harem persists, yearning to rid the writer of notions of femininity and sexuality and instead help her more fully inhabit that part of herself. This part of herself is creative, writes books, and wakes up early to stroll along the Bosphorus and observe fisherman.

In today’s world of carefully curated social media presence, the black milk metaphor takes on new dimensions. The digital performance of maternal-artistic identity creates narratives that both inspire and shame, adding modern layers to ancient anxieties. Instagram-perfect images of artist-mothers—laptop screens glowing beside peaceful infants and ink-stained hands preparing organic lunches create a fiction of seamless transition that masks the violent reality of creative reconciliation. As Shafak herself observes in “Storytelling, Fake Worlds, and the Internet,” social media has “opened up new possibilities for women in patriarchal societies,” transforming media into a “political and ideological terrain.” This representation of the digital world into a battleground for literary production finds its boundaries blurred, thereby eliminating the toxicity of black milk for women writers struggling to find their own balance. Identity in accordance with class, religion, nationality, or gender finds itself in a compromised position when posed against the notebook that fills Shafak’s imagination. In her notebook, characters, conflicts, overt lies, and hidden truths become so fluid that it’s almost impossible to find the boundaries between the real and the imagined. Readers find themselves immersed in a world so carefully constructed by the author that gender finds no place in its identification.

In recent years, homes have transformed themselves from spaces for family and gatherings to ones of artistic creation. Women artists find themselves confronting the empty notebook not just as metaphor but as daily reality. The black milk of creative fear flowed more freely in isolation, its darkness deepened by the intensification of maternal responsibility under crisis. Yet within this landscape of constraint, Shafak’s work suggests radical possibility. The empty notebook becomes not just a void but a space of potential transformation, its blankness awaits words and ideas that will emerge transformed by the very struggles that threatened to silence them. As Niloufar Khosravi Balalami suggests, to represent the image of the mother figure justly, “woman writers are compelled to stand against this overly simplistic depiction to portray her as complex and different.” This alchemical process gains additional significance when viewed through Cecila Inés Luque’s framework of the idea of a woman and as a writer, disclosing the “limitation of the category of ‘women’s literature’” and furthermore suggesting the “pertinence of replacing it with that of writing like (or as) a woman.” The metamorphosis of black milk into golden words represents sublimation of maternal fear into creative power. This process challenges traditional literary narratives that position motherhood and creativity as antagonistic forces, suggesting instead a symbiotic relationship where each feeds and changes the other.

In the quiet moments between creation and nurturing, between the blank page and the full heart, women artists forge their path with determined grace. Their stories merge into a vast river of feminine creative experience, carrying with them centuries of resistance against the patriarchal pathologization of their creative struggles. Where medical discourse once diagnosed creative paralysis along Freudian lines, blaming, as M. Castillo puts it, “oral masochism and a milk-denying mother,” a convenient label that reduced artistic ambition to mere biological dysfunction, women writers have transformed their supposed hysteria into method. In her text, Shafak demonstrates how to embody both mother and artist, both nurturer and creator, both source and seeker of sustenance. The empty notebook stands as a space of infinite possibility, its pages awaiting words that carry the weight and wisdom of maternal experience. This integration of maternal and artistic identity establishes a revolutionary model for creative production, one that challenges and ultimately transcends traditional Western notions of artistic genius as requiring isolation and autonomy.

Shafak’s work illuminates a profound truth: the transformation of mother’s milk into black milk serves as both catalyst and invitation—a powerful affirmation that our deepest fears contain the seeds of change. The harem within emerges not as prison guards but as a chorus of multiplicity, offering voices and perspectives that enrich and deepen creative work. Through their struggles and triumphs, women artists prove that the most profound transformations emerge from confronting our darkest fears, demonstrating that the blackest milk nourishes the most essential growth. In this process, the very substance that threatened to poison creativity becomes the ink that writes new possibilities into existence.

Support JSTOR Daily! Join our membership program on Patreon today.